FRC, Ann Coulter, James Dobson and Friends: Lining Up For The Obama Gangbang!

O.K., if the title of this post didn't peak readers' interest, nothing will.

But seriously, the way Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, Ann Coulter(geist) and other neocons on the Far Right fringe are lining up to attack President-elect Barack Obama is criminal. They're not going to wait for January 21st. To mix metaphors, they're ready to kill the wabbit. They truly are Elmer Fudds going after Bugs Bunny. Too bad for them that Bugs is the smart one who gets away. But, like Elmer Fudds, they'll be too stupid to admit defeat:

Today, the President-elect is hoping to attract Republican support by sweetening the deal with $300 billion in tax cuts. At this point, we don't know how the tax cuts will be presented--whether in a separate House bill or as a portion of the stimulus package. The details have not been released, and the lack of transparency speaks volumes.

In other words, Tony Perkins didn't see FRC's name on the bill.

To call for such colossal spending without detailing what our tax dollars are funding is completely irresponsible. FRC will forcefully advocate that families are represented in the proposed tax cuts. President Bush did an admirable job promoting pro-family tax policies through his per child tax credit and marriage penalty relief. Easing Americans out of this crisis should include making the Bush tax cuts permanent.

Tony' Perkin's pissed because his "families" payed less under B**h (still a four-letter word) than they might pay under Obama. The fact that FRC thinks B**h did an "admirable job" "speaks volumes": instead of screwing the singles as he should, Obama is out to screw families!

In line for the Obama gangbang is also James Dobson, who accused Barack Obama of distorting the Bible and calling Obama's take on the Constitution a "fruitcake interpretation." This, from a man who favors the beating of unruly sons and daughters, talking about a man who taught Constitutional law! (But, of course, not at the RIGHT university: not Pat Robertson's 4th grade Regent University but - gasp! - ultra commie-pinko University of Chicago!).

Next, but not last, is Ann Coulter(geist) in her new book, Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America, Coulter has the audacity to knock Michelle Obama's fasion sense:

Her obvious imitation of Jackie O's style - the flipped-under hair, the sleeveless A-line dresses, the short strands of fake pearls - would have been laughable if done by anyone other than a media-designated saint."

Unfortunately for Coulter, that's about all she can muster. But to her, it's enough. Now, if Coulter should wear a tight skirt (along with a tighter face) on the talk shows today, let's all tell the Amazon for Adolph that we don't exactly think she's fashion Kosher. Alright, sorry, that's a cheap smear. Sorry, Ann. It's just that with your long legs, looong blond hair, and deep tan you look more like a Palomino than a pinup girl for neocons. Please don't go to England - Princess Anne would try to ride you!

So these are the kind of people lining up to do "the dirty deed" to Barack Obama along with Michelle Obama (and probably Sasha and Malia - somehow FRC will paint them as anti-family). These people are scrounging, culling the bottom of the political ocean for anything they can get. Well, fasten your dildo, Dobson et al, it's going to a very bumpy four years!

Just a thought!