90 Squeakers: B**h Does Further Damage Before He Leaves

Up Yours, America!

George W. B**h is deregulating again - with a vengeance. Up to 90 deregulations affecting the nation could become policy before Barack Obama takes office:

(From Washington Post - R. Jeffrey Smith):

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

In May, White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten vowed that the administration would propose no regulations after June 1. He and White House spokesman Tony Fratto have repeatedly stated their contempt for what they call “midnight regulations.”

O.K., Enough is enough already! We know how much B**h hates environmentalists, loves big business and war, and knows nothing about healthcare or education. He's brought this country down so much that it will take decades for us to get back on our feet. His war, his deregulation, his interrogation methods have all said a big FUCK YOU! to America, but he's a glutton: he'll get in his last digs even if they are the last things he'll ever do to this country (or IN this country: read below).

Why?!? Does he hate us so much that he would enact deregulations to ruin us? O.K., so we made fun of his gross stupidity and blocked his chances to create numerous satellite USAs. Deregulating everything in a hurry while the country is suffering from eight years of deregulation just doesn't make sense. O.K., you have a point: much of what B**h did never made any sense. Then it's vengeance pure and simple. Either that or he's getting a little under the table.

But for leaving the country in a shambles and then BULLDOZING it, he should get something: justice.

WTF?!! Voting For Obama Was A Mortal Sin?!! Was The Pitbull in the Pulpit?

Must Be The Spiritual Adviser of Ann Coulter!

(from AP Nov.13, 3:45PM EST)

COLUMBIA, S.C. - A South Carolina Roman Catholic priest has told his parishioners that they should refrain from receiving Holy Communion if they voted for Barack Obama because the Democratic president-elect supports abortion, and supporting him "constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil."

The Rev. Jay Scott Newman said in a letter distributed Sunday to parishioners at St. Mary's Catholic Church in Greenville that they are putting their souls at risk if they take Holy Communion before doing penance for their vote.

"Our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president," Newman wrote, referring to Obama by his full name, including his middle name of Hussein.

As a recovering Catholic, I can tell you that NO ONE - no priest, no bishop, no pope - can ever, ever restrain you from receiving Holy Communion! There is something called "an act of contrition," which, if made sincerely before Communion, allows one to take Holy Communion. The only circumstance (to my knowledge) where you cannot receive communion is if you have been excommunicated by the church.

Using religion for political reasons (like the 1955 article above) is criminal. Clearly this priest couldn't tell his parish how to vote before the election, but decided to zap Obama supporters AFTER the election.

By his letter, Rev. Jay Scott You-Have-Sinned Newman revealed his loathing for Obama. Right-wing rednecks have been mentioning Obama's middle name as a slur against the President-elect (as well as Ann Coulter, but, then again, we all know that rednecks have better taste) Of course, I don't know which single-wide Newman crawled out from under, but his statement was against doctrine, abusive and too provocative: since South Carolina has one of the country's largest ratios of hate groups, it might have been expected from a preacher who matriculated at a store-front Bible school, but not a priest who (supposedly) received extensive education in both a college and a seminary. His screed is divisive and it is racist.

Make no mistake about it, folks, Padre Newman's a gunnin' for Obama!

Just a thought.

Obama's Most Critical Diplomatic Challenge: Nov. 15

Diplomacy is like tightrope walking without a net - and no weights. Impartiality is too ephemeral. Diplomats are statesman who know that there are only two possible ends to diplomacy: peace or war. On Nov. 15th (this Saturday) a grassroots effort will be taking place and, because it first started out "viral", it may become global.

At first glance, it is the protest of the passage of California's Proposition 8. It should be a statewide protest.

It won't be.

It should be, at most, a nationwide protest.

It might not be.
Similar propositions have made it through state constitutions without this much fuss. So why now? Simple: it's California. If any state of the Union should have marriage equality, California would be the natural first choice. Instead, Massachusetts and Connecticut have forged the way. Many people see the votes for Prop 8 as votes for hate; hate against a state that houses some of the most compassionate and liberal entities: like San Francisco. The campaign to push through Prop 8 was not a "defense" of marriage but an overt attack against a certain group of people, making them second-class citizens. Prop 8 supporters looked like a group of steamrollers ready to crush anything in their path.

On Saturday, physical conflict may be inevitable. So the question is: how will president-elect Barack Obama react on Saturday? Will he choose to react at all? Will he act diplomatically? Or will he antagonize citizens on both sides? One side is already girding their loins for a war against the dreaded LIBERALS!:

(From Tony Perkins, Family Research Council):

In January, we will see the government consolidated in the hands of the most radical, left-wing president and Congress in the history of our Republic. And they plan to drastically change our nation the moment they take power.

...Never forget: Extreme liberalism does not work as a governing philosophy. As in the past, the Left is likely to suffer a rapid backlash as their policies are exposed... and as they fail to help Americans.

Importantly, most Americans still disagree with the newly elected leaders in Washington, D.C. on issues of faith, family, and freedom.

That's why "most Americans" elected Barack Obama? Reality check: the "Dark Side" of this culture will not negotiate. NEVER. Why? #1: They're made up of Christofascists who rely on hatred to further their goals. Negotiation would look like weakness to their "sheeple" and in order to control their flocks, they must never look weak. #2: There is no #2.


Dear President-Elect Obama: we're sorry that you're hit with a social crises before you even take office. But if you can resolve this battle in our own culture war, you will be lionized as a genius of statesmanship.

What Will The Gay D-Day Bring?

Out of clutter, find simplicity.
From discord, find harmony.
In the middle of difficulty, lies opportunity.

- Albert Einstein

Backlash can create backlash can create backlash can create backlash until someone steps in to stop the cycle... or everyone is dead. Cyclical backlash is a very close relative to revenge killings in the Middle East. When a member of one family or tribe kills someone from a different family or tribe, the different one has an obligation to kill someone from the first tribe. Then the first tribe has an obligation to... and on and on and on. Unless there is some sort of formal truce, the vengeance killing can go on for centuries.

We're looking at two different sides of a cultural and cyclical backlash: same-sex marriage was proclaimed legal by the city of San Francisco. Politicized religious groups began to object by making some states ban the practice. Gay rights groups made marriage equality their marching banner.

Then came the Christian Right's backlash: California's Proposition 8.

The campaign saw both sides shouting about "freedoms" and "rights". The Christian Right kept saying that they had God on their side. In fact, they blamed God ("God WANTS us to do this!"). The humanists (yes, including Christian homosexuals) said that their marriage rights were basic human rights.

On Nov. 4, the campaign for Proposition 8 was won after one of the most vicious, misleading and unbelievably criminal campaigns ever experienced. It involved extortion, out-of-state money and manpower from churches, outright lies, and, most of all - mongering of hate and fear.

So now a counter backlash has been set in motion: Saturday, Nov. 15th will see a NATIONAL protest against California's Proposition 8. A protest of epic, if not historic proportions.

(From the blog by gay journalist and activist Rex Wockner)

Maybe Stonewall was Activism 1.0, ACT UP was Activism 2.0, the failed corporate activism of HRC and No On Prop 8 was Activism 3.0, and now we are witnessing Activism 4.0 being born....

And on this Saturday, in California alone, it is set to happen in Bakersfield, Chico, Colton, Costa Mesa, Delano, Escondido, Eureka, Fairfield, Fresno, Irvine, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Moreno Valley, Napa, Oakland, Palm Springs, Pasadena, Pomona, Riverside, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, Stockton and Ventura. And that's just as of today. With the speed of "viral" organizing, the list could be twice as long by Saturday.

Question: how will people view this kind of "activism"? Will some see it as a kind of anarchy? Will it cause another, more virulent backlash? How many Christofascists will be counter-protesting? Will this new activism cost lives?

It might.

Just a thought.

The Stonewall Inn - Activism 101

Stonewall Inn
Originally uploaded by GhstLght74

Where it all started! June 28, 1969.

This is one national landmark some people would like to see burned to the ground! Like the Statue of Liberty, The Stonewall Inn stands for freedom and justice to the LGBT communities of the world.

Obama In, Lobbyists Out! B**h Out, Transparency In!

(from The Washington Independent)

John Podesta, co-chair of President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team, announced today that Obama would extend the restrictions on lobbyists during his presidential campaign to his transition to the White House. The transition team outlined the changes in a press release:

· Federal Lobbyists cannot contribute financially to the transition.

· Federal lobbyists are prohibited from any lobbying during their work with the transition.

· If someone has lobbied in the last 12 months, they are prohibited from working in the fields of policy on which they lobbied.

· If someone becomes a lobbyist after working on the Transition, they are prohibited from lobbying the Administration for 12 months on matters on which they worked.

· A gift ban that is aggressive in reducing the influence of special interests.

During a 45-minute briefing with reporters in Washington, Podesta also suggested that those who go to work for the Obama administration would be prohibited from lobbying the administration for two years after leaving.

Will there be more restrictions? Let's hope so. If Congress wants to maintain its integrity (as if it ever had any), it will put regulations and restrictions across the board for all lobbyists. Yes, I know that associations like the ACLU pay lobbyists big money to represent them, but that money shouldn't be used for gifts or extravagant "meetings." At Thanksgiving, congressmen and senators should be carving their own turkeys and not ones stuffed with Rolexes.

What do you think?

Just a thought.

A Very White Saxby Chambliss Laments: Damn Those Early Voting Obamacons!

Citing ‘High Percentage Of Minority Vote’ In GA, Chambliss Laments
Not Getting ‘Our Folks’ Out To Vote!

With a name like Saxby Chambliss, I would have thought.... oh, well. Proof positive that the state of Georgia still hasn't gotten over that War Between the States thing. Of course it was on FOX News. I'm sure some of FOX's viewers didn't get the implication:

Watch: