Saturday, June 21, 2008

Bush


Bush
Originally uploaded by tomatowithbasil
The comment connected to this photo on Flickr was:

"My best friend's father smoked weed and snorted cocaine with our president...really, truly.

Bush is a hypocrite. I don't respect him."

Gee, that's not the George Bush we knew!

Friday, June 20, 2008

Queen Victoria and Today's Marrying Poofs: She Might Not Be Amused...

... But The Duke of Clarence Might!*

Some Christofascist thinking is termed mid-Victorian. And with good reason: the vision of Victoria surrounded by her offspring with Teutonic and boring Albert at her side seems the epitome of family values. She was a stalwart child-bearer - kept in an almost perpetual state of pregnancy by Albert for ten years (nine children), and she let Albert be the head of the family (very Prussian upbringing - I think even the girls were taught to goosestep!). And there were so very many things of which she disapproved: with the exception of the "sublime" Albert, she disapproved of sex in almost any form. (Irony: what is considered, even by today's standards, a very kinky type piercing is called a "Prince Albert" - always an embarrassing situation at airport security). For some people, attendance at her court was considered to be more of a penance than a boon (women especially). Only "naughty Bertie" the Prince of Wales ever livened it up, but even he kept a vast distance between himself and "mama" most of the time. And when Albert died, an entire nation had to mourn - for about twenty years. The palace looked like the main chapel of a funeral parlor and Victoria NEVER wore any color but black for the rest of her (long) life.

Forget the Fabulous Fifties, the Roaring Twenties or even the Gilded Age.. Fundamentalists, Reconstructionists and Christofascists everywhere pray that we must return to the Victorian age before Christ comes again. The Age was so pure, so masculine, so romantic. Why, can't you see Ann Coulter(geist) in a crinoline? At 6'1" and in an 17"-waist whalebone corset, she would have cut a dashing (if odd) figure! And the New Victorian Age would demand that Faith and Religion (Christian only, of course) take precedent over science instead of (horrors!) the other way around as it is today!

A VERY flattering portrait of Victoria

O.K., I'll give up the effusive rhetoric to make a point: the attack on same-sex marriage has become so outrageous as to become embarrassing to the rest of the (yes) civilized world. The latest FRC article focusing on Norway's legalization of same-sex marriage - in the usual Putrescent Perkins style: "Norway Is Not Our Way" - insults the country by characterizing it as the world's non-family-oriented playground:

"Advocates claim that broadening the scope of marriage will actually strengthen it as an institution. But Scandinavia and the Netherlands' experiences with counterfeit marriages have thoroughly refuted that argument. Heterosexual marriage rates have plummeted, unstable cohabiting relationships have increased, out-of-wedlock births have skyrocketed...While other, more liberal countries may be blazing a trail of social experimentation, rest assured they are watching America for validation.",

Huh? Sorry, Perkins, but it's been a long time since any other country looked to us for validation. America is frequently considered the country NOT to copy, especially when it comes to "family values" and foreign policy. George W. Bush saw to it that American arrogance and aggression were placed front and center ahead of the rest of the world. And many of your companion Christofascists are making American religion look, well, too...silly. "Word of Faith" preachers are cropping up, building laser-lighted stadiums so that they can dance to their bizarre untheological theories. Unlike many Americans, Europeans are realizing that they have to learn from history's mistakes, not go backwards in time to an imagined history. Victorians did that too: they built faux castles, made decorative armor, and romanticized themes beyond recognition. Then (horrors!) science and industry appeared and the "genuine gothic" didn't just disappear - it collapsed like a flimsy set built for an even flimsier play. And in literature, Tennyson was giving way to Whitman, and Edward Bulwer-Lytton ("It was a dark and stormy night...") gave way to Mark Twain.


The Gothic pile of stones built by "It was a dark and stormy night"

What the whole of the Religious Right is blinded by its legendary bigotry (sorry) and wants desperately to regress into its own "historical" novel, some nations want to progress into what they are now proud to call CIVILization.


* The Duke of Clarence was grandson of Victoria and second in line to the throne after his father "Bertie" (Edward VII). While a great deal of rumors flew about his misadventures (he was even suspected of being "Jack the Ripper"!), the most prevalent one was his implication in a male brothel scandal. His death from an influenza pandemic brought about all sorts of conspiracy theories:

(from Wikipedia):

"...that he died of syphilis or was poisoned or pushed off a cliff on the instructions of Lord Randolph Churchill or that his death was faked to remove him from the line of succession and that he survived until the 1930s in a mental hospital on the Isle of Wight or imprisoned in Glamis Castle..."

The one that hasn't been completely negated, however, is that his family asked the doctor to do relatively little in the way of administering any antibiotics. Even if the rumors were untrue, what was evident was that someone did not want Albert Victor (Clarence) to become king.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

The Diplomatic Dimwit Strikes Again!

He's done it again.

Our beloved half-wit has demoted the Pope publicly,
evidently thinking that "eminence" was high enough!

(from Whispers in the Loggia)

POTUS Demotes Pope

The protocol's never been any sort of state secret: the Pope is addressed as "Your Holiness" or, by his own, "Most Holy Father."

But as he began his farewell visit to B16 last Friday, President Bush -- whose administration has shown a bizarre, uncheckedpenchant for the, er, unique term "His Holy Father" over the years -- took the salutation to an even odder place:
"Your Eminence, you're looking good," Bush told the pope.
For the record, the greeting would've been perfectly delivered... were the President giving it to a cardinal.

Little Lizzie Borden

On June 20, 1893, Lizzie Borden was acquitted on the murder of her father and stepmother. She moved out their house with her sister and thereafter resided in a stylish house, "Maplecroft" across town . She never married. When she died in 1927, she left $30,000 to the local animal rescue league and $500 for the perpetual care of her father's grave.

Meet the New Rosenbergs:


...At Guantanamo

On this day in 1953, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed in Sing Sing, NY.

"We are the first victims of American fascism".

(From Wikipedia)

Their case has been at the center of the controversy over communism in the United States ever since, with supporters steadfastly maintaining that their conviction was an egregious example of persecution typical of the "hysteria" of those times and likening it to the witch hunts that marred Salem and medieval Europe.

There are, of course, differences in the Rosenberg case and the detainees at Guantanamo: first, they were allowed legal counsel and, second, they were given a trial. And they had supporters:

Jean-Paul Sartre called the case "a legal lynching which smears with blood a whole nation. By killing the Rosenbergs, you have quite simply tried to halt the progress of science by human sacrifice. Magic, witch-hunts, auto-da-fés, sacrifices—we are here getting to the point: your country is sick with fear... you are afraid of the shadow of your own bomb." Among other opposers to the execution: Dashiell Hammett, Jean Cocteau, Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo, Einstien, Pope Pius XII, the all-Black International Longshoremen’s Association Local 968, Fritz Lang and Bertolt Brecht.

Note: of the many voices against the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo, there don't seem to be many religious ones. There was a play entitled "Jesus, The Guantanamo Years," by Abie Philbin Bowman, but it certainly didn't have a Christofascist bent. Or even a Progressive Christian leaning.

So, no one with a clerical collar is laying down his life for Gitmos. Figures.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Tea With Mussolini, Bourbon With Huey Long and Milk With James Dobson

How Do You Define America's Newest Fascism?
(No, Not Fashion - FASCISM!)

O.K., let's really talk about Christofascism. You've read about it in this blog ad infinitum, but I've never really sought to define it in terms we can all understand. First of all, Fascism is the antithesis of democracy. It's cloaked as a populist movement involving everyone. In a sense, it is extreme nationalism led by one person, usually a dictator, or a small group of people. When does it occur? It takes advantage of social crisis and political upheaval. Here are two very distinct definitions of Fascism from two distinct leaders:
"Fascism, which was not afraid to call itself reactionary. . .does not hesitate to call itself illiberal and anti-liberal."
--Benito Mussolini

"If fascism came to America, it would be on a program of Americanism."

--Huey P. Long

As Matthew N. Lyons writes in his chapter in "Eyes Right! Challenging the Right Wing Backlash:"

"Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three. Fascism rejects the principles of class struggle and workers' internationalism as threats to national or racial unity, yet it often exploits real grievances against capitalists and landowners through ethnic scapegoating or radical-sounding conspiracy theories. Fascism rejects the liberal doctrines of individual autonomy and rights, political pluralism, and representative government, yet it advocates broad popular participation in politics and may use parliamentary channels in its drive to power. Its vision of a "new order" clashes with the conservative attachment to tradition-based institutions and hierarchies, yet fascism often romanticizes the past as inspiration for national rebirth."

Huey Long, Louisiana Governor and Senator, was often described in fascist terms: he was a populist, no doubt, and he was very, very power-hungry in the end, but his contributions to the State of Louisiana are undisputed. He was thought to be corrupt and he certainly took cronyism to new heights, but there was an aura about him which the people of Louisiana worshipped. He admitted to some of his shady politics, but said that things could not be done for his constituents without political slight-of-hand and outright bribes.


So, who is today's preeminent Fascist? The Christofascist James Dobson. He tauts liberty and (religious) freedom, but has he become a nationalist to be admired - or feared? There is no doubt that he is a Dominionist:

(From Wikipedia):

Dobson's Family Research Council is identified as an dominionist organization by TheocracyWatch, which says that the Congressional scorecard of the Family Research Council illustrates its success and the strength of dominionists in Congress. It is claimed that Dobson's teachings include many tenets of the Dominionist movement.

Dobson is cited by social observers and the press as a leading figure in the Dominionism movement.A May 2005 article in Harpers described Dobson as "perhaps the most powerful figure in the Dominionist movement" and "a crucial player in getting out the Christian vote for George W. Bush."One ministry described Dobson as "One of its [the Dominionism movement] most powerful leaders."

Dobson stresses that parents must uphold their authority and do so consistently, comparing the relationship between parents and disobedient children to a battle: "When you are defiantly challenged, win decisively." In The Strong-Willed Child, Dobson draws an analogy between the defiance of a family pet and that of a small child, and concludes that "just as surely as a dog will occasionally challenge the authority of his leaders, so will a little child — only more so.

(emphasis in original)

Dobson's Dominionism would not be a problem if it did not have a strong Reconstructionist bent: Dobson sees a Fascist Theocracy for America and, if he lives long enough, with him as its Christian-only pope. His attack dog, Tony Perkins, a semi-literate old choir boy (alright, I'll stop it), a graduate of Pat Robertson's Regent University, hosts a "Values Voters' Summit," before election time. Basically, it's a "Dobson for Holy Dictator" rally that seems like it focuses on the family, but in reality acts as a hate group against its current "family crisis": homosexuality, in particular, same-sex marriage.

Of course, same-sex marriage is the convenient anti-family demon. That and abortion. But what if it didn't have these two things to vent it's rage on?

Christofascists would find something else. It's true that "Fundamentalism" in its current form is fairly recent (1920s) as a reaction to "modernism", but Christofascism has a much longer history. We had a form of it in the Puritan colonies, Spain's expulsion of the Jews and even as far back as the closing of Plato's Academy (by the early bishops of Christianity).

And its strength is something we all should worry about: the pulpit and the voting booth have joined together as never before in our country. Strange, isn't it, that we're becoming exactly what we sought freedom from: one of the reasons for the American Revolution was freedom from the Anglican Church (Church of England).

If Dobson gets his way, there will be a new kind of government for America.

Beware.

BTW: What kind of person other than a dictator would have his "Christmas jacket" on display? Let's hope that his clothes aren't revered as saintly relics. Dobson too should beware: dictators - theocratic or not - are sometimes deposed, and not in a civilized fashion. Below is a picture of Mussolini, his body on a meathook on display in Milan.

Have a nice day.

They Want YOU!



...To Act Like An American!

Today is the birth date of James Montgomery Flagg, the artist who gave us the definitive Uncle Sam (b. June 18, 1877)

The image he created was meant to be formidable (for a recruitment poster in WWI), and it projects what many foreign countries see us as: a stern man pointing a finger accusingly. He might even be saying "Look Out! You're Next!"